Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 98491 for court records search online.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 98491 for court records search online.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s discretionary decisions. Steiner v. Steiner, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625675 - 2023-02-23
search the record for reasons to sustain the court’s discretionary decisions. Steiner v. Steiner, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625675 - 2023-02-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
findings are not clearly erroneous. The record satisfies us that the court’s and defense counsel’s joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
findings are not clearly erroneous. The record satisfies us that the court’s and defense counsel’s joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
next to the search. The factual record of Torres–Nunez’s consent to a search of the home is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30294 - 2007-09-17
next to the search. The factual record of Torres–Nunez’s consent to a search of the home is undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30294 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a crime and that the objects sought will be found in the place to be searched.” The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100778 - 2017-09-21
of a crime and that the objects sought will be found in the place to be searched.” The court further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100778 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” had Davis and Charles R. testified. ¶32 We conclude that the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163738 - 2017-09-21
” had Davis and Charles R. testified. ¶32 We conclude that the record supports the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163738 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the trial court’s reasoning: “The record is devoid of any motive [H.P.] might have had to lie, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
with the trial court’s reasoning: “The record is devoid of any motive [H.P.] might have had to lie, and he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not establish probable cause for the search warrant. The postconviction court denied his motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219578 - 2018-09-25
not establish probable cause for the search warrant. The postconviction court denied his motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219578 - 2018-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
rendering any consent to search a nullity. In doing so, he posits several objections to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28894 - 2007-05-07
rendering any consent to search a nullity. In doing so, he posits several objections to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28894 - 2007-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the search of the white phone exceeded the warrant’s scope. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19
and that the search of the white phone exceeded the warrant’s scope. Following a hearing, the trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94286 - 2013-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the circuit court which reraised his search and seizure issues and also alleged that postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06
in the circuit court which reraised his search and seizure issues and also alleged that postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204468 - 2017-12-06