Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 30059 for de.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 30059 for de.
State v. Gregory Johnson
of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13672 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis.2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165, 166 (1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13672 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey S. Gill
that we review de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03
that we review de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17950 - 2005-05-03
[PDF]
Susan Malone v. Daniel G. Gaengel
part of their policy. II. Although assisted by the trial court's analysis, we review de novo its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13855 - 2014-09-15
part of their policy. II. Although assisted by the trial court's analysis, we review de novo its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13855 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 25, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
. App. 1984). In an appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108338 - 2014-02-24
. App. 1984). In an appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108338 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
Antwaun Vance v. James J. Sukup
-4- II. Our review of a trial court's grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9828 - 2017-09-19
-4- II. Our review of a trial court's grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9828 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
William W. Marquardt v. Milwaukee County
basis, our standard of review is de novo. ¶10 Generally, the interpretation of a statute or ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14858 - 2017-09-21
basis, our standard of review is de novo. ¶10 Generally, the interpretation of a statute or ordinance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14858 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
St. Laurent’s claims. Discussion ¶5 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34053 - 2008-09-15
St. Laurent’s claims. Discussion ¶5 We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34053 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
Garment, 43 F. 3d 364, 367 (8th Cir. 1994).4 Interpretation of such a document is generally a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12999 - 2017-09-21
Garment, 43 F. 3d 364, 367 (8th Cir. 1994).4 Interpretation of such a document is generally a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12999 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Third World, LLC v. Robert Wiese
construction is a question of law we review de novo. Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 126 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3824 - 2017-09-20
construction is a question of law we review de novo. Koenings v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 126 Wis. 2d 349
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3824 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.’” Id., ¶26 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796929 - 2024-05-07
on the inaccurate information in the sentencing.’” Id., ¶26 (citation omitted). We review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796929 - 2024-05-07