Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 6129 for li.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 6129 for li.
State v. Daniel R. Parsley
early. Thus, Parsley’s credibility was challenged through evidence suggesting he lied to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
early. Thus, Parsley’s credibility was challenged through evidence suggesting he lied to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5608 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The decision to send an exhibit to the jury room during deliberations is one that lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
The decision to send an exhibit to the jury room during deliberations is one that lies within the discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52700 - 2010-07-28
State v. Richard M. Pease, Jr.
fall under the Fourteenth Amendment.”). He asserts that the coroner lied when he testified that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
fall under the Fourteenth Amendment.”). He asserts that the coroner lied when he testified that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16288 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
lies with the employee to prove that his or her union breached its duty of fair representation. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
lies with the employee to prove that his or her union breached its duty of fair representation. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72231 - 2011-10-12
[PDF]
WI APP 128
decision to admit or exclude evidence generally lies within its discretion, a court’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87657 - 2014-09-15
decision to admit or exclude evidence generally lies within its discretion, a court’s interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87657 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
because “at the [post-conviction] hearing Twocrow stated he lied to the Court during the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110319 - 2014-04-14
because “at the [post-conviction] hearing Twocrow stated he lied to the Court during the plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110319 - 2014-04-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with complications of hypothermia evident in the emergency room. 4 The evidence indicated that Zalazar also lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77683 - 2014-09-15
with complications of hypothermia evident in the emergency room. 4 The evidence indicated that Zalazar also lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77683 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then admitted the smart phone was his, but lied about being able to access the internet on it. A subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248918 - 2019-10-22
then admitted the smart phone was his, but lied about being able to access the internet on it. A subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248918 - 2019-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Remain Silent at Sentencing ¶25 Sentencing lies within the sentencing court’s discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224562 - 2018-10-30
to Remain Silent at Sentencing ¶25 Sentencing lies within the sentencing court’s discretion. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224562 - 2018-10-30
[PDF]
State v. Noel Davila
with his alleged violation of the sequestration order. Ruiz initially lied about his understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19
with his alleged violation of the sequestration order. Ruiz initially lied about his understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5699 - 2017-09-19