Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38101 - 38110 of 49954 for our.
Search results 38101 - 38110 of 49954 for our.
CA Blank Order
meritorious challenge to the sentence. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion, and our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98134 - 2013-06-10
meritorious challenge to the sentence. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion, and our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98134 - 2013-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Wright has raised no issues of arguable merit in his response.3 Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986032 - 2025-07-22
that Wright has raised no issues of arguable merit in his response.3 Our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=986032 - 2025-07-22
State v. Heidi Strom
referred to as probable cause—has been described by our Supreme Court: “Probable cause to arrest refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9516 - 2005-03-31
referred to as probable cause—has been described by our Supreme Court: “Probable cause to arrest refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
did not understand; and that he had a learning disability. After our order for the supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
did not understand; and that he had a learning disability. After our order for the supplemental
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was found in contempt does not change our analysis. Even if a court order later proves to be clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
was found in contempt does not change our analysis. Even if a court order later proves to be clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99716 - 2013-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
administrative closure of Deichsel’s file. No. 2016AP2350 2 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210040 - 2018-03-21
administrative closure of Deichsel’s file. No. 2016AP2350 2 Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210040 - 2018-03-21
[PDF]
State v. David L. Kelly
). ¶5 Our standard of review of the trial court’s admissibility determination is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3317 - 2017-09-19
). ¶5 Our standard of review of the trial court’s admissibility determination is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3317 - 2017-09-19
Catherine J. Farrey v. Russell S. Gonnering
in denying her § 806.07, Stats., motion. In light of our decision reversing the trial court's grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
in denying her § 806.07, Stats., motion. In light of our decision reversing the trial court's grant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9076 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
Whether a statute has retroactive application is a question of law subject to our de novo review. Salzman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31
Whether a statute has retroactive application is a question of law subject to our de novo review. Salzman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Markham O. Mayne
an evidentiary hearing. Mayne raises numerous issues on appeal. Only one issue is adequately briefed for our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21
an evidentiary hearing. Mayne raises numerous issues on appeal. Only one issue is adequately briefed for our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16256 - 2017-09-21