Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38111 - 38120 of 63515 for records/1000.
Search results 38111 - 38120 of 63515 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be denied without an evidentiary hearing if the record as a whole conclusively demonstrates that relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142461 - 2017-09-21
be denied without an evidentiary hearing if the record as a whole conclusively demonstrates that relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142461 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99318 - 2013-07-16
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99318 - 2013-07-16
Dunn County v. Kelly D.
proceedings. In the alternative, she argues that the placement decision is unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
proceedings. In the alternative, she argues that the placement decision is unsupported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3125 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael S. Czarnecki
– was pretextual. However, the record reveals that the trial court accepted the officer’s explanation that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
– was pretextual. However, the record reveals that the trial court accepted the officer’s explanation that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 Burkett’s postconviction motion is not in the appellate records. Although we could summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
3 Burkett’s postconviction motion is not in the appellate records. Although we could summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Exhibit F in the record is a signed agreement between Lamar and the DOT. In it, Lamar accepted a “total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64403 - 2014-09-15
. Exhibit F in the record is a signed agreement between Lamar and the DOT. In it, Lamar accepted a “total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64403 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs1 and record, we conclude at 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431716 - 2021-09-29
review of the briefs1 and record, we conclude at 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431716 - 2021-09-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
of the van and go into Mueller’s apartment. Records listed Kapinos as the owner of the apartment. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27505 - 2006-12-18
of the van and go into Mueller’s apartment. Records listed Kapinos as the owner of the apartment. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27505 - 2006-12-18
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Miller
of that test were not admitted. No. 03-0037-CR 4 video recorder recorded a voice stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
of that test were not admitted. No. 03-0037-CR 4 video recorder recorded a voice stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6022 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Dominic J. Vittone v. Kathleen M. Vittone
No. 95-1103 -2- weeks to determine Dominic's income though the record indicates that Dominic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8949 - 2017-09-19
No. 95-1103 -2- weeks to determine Dominic's income though the record indicates that Dominic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8949 - 2017-09-19