Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38121 - 38130 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 38121 - 38130 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Gregory Badalich
of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15615 - 2017-09-21
of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15615 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven G. Loveday
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.[1] I. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11407 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
denied the motion, concluding that, at the time of the backup request, Campbell already had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
denied the motion, concluding that, at the time of the backup request, Campbell already had probable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56707 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6867 - 2017-09-20
appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6867 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Mola
appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6866 - 2017-09-20
appeals the circuit court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issues are: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6866 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erred in denying K.L.’s motion to dismiss. Before trial, K.L.’s attorney moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282384 - 2020-09-01
erred in denying K.L.’s motion to dismiss. Before trial, K.L.’s attorney moved to dismiss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282384 - 2020-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 30, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
with the statutory time period (excusable neglect). If a motion is made after the expiration of the specified time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27289 - 2006-11-29
with the statutory time period (excusable neglect). If a motion is made after the expiration of the specified time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27289 - 2006-11-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment of conviction for a yellow traffic signal violation. On this court’s own motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694634 - 2023-08-24
appeals a judgment of conviction for a yellow traffic signal violation. On this court’s own motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694634 - 2023-08-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
Here, Sweeney’s motion alleged that there was nothing in the record of the prior OWI case that showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
Here, Sweeney’s motion alleged that there was nothing in the record of the prior OWI case that showed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51517 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Crittendon, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. Crittendon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175189 - 2017-09-21
Crittendon, pro se, appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. Crittendon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175189 - 2017-09-21