Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38131 - 38140 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38131 - 38140 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for suspicion for operating while intoxicated, and that alone was the reason for the arrest, officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134925 - 2017-09-21
for suspicion for operating while intoxicated, and that alone was the reason for the arrest, officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134925 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, not for the precise number of years chosen, and it need not explain why it did not impose a lesser sentence.” State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
, not for the precise number of years chosen, and it need not explain why it did not impose a lesser sentence.” State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=592719 - 2022-11-22
State v. Timothy Netzer
disagree and conclude the trial court did not err in denying Netzer’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
disagree and conclude the trial court did not err in denying Netzer’s motion. Accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12587 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
granted. The situation as it unfolded at trial was not a Bruton situation. Benson did testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
granted. The situation as it unfolded at trial was not a Bruton situation. Benson did testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45773 - 2010-01-13
COURT OF APPEALS
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
COURT OF APPEALS
convictions because this court did not address his current claims in Williams II. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
convictions because this court did not address his current claims in Williams II. We reject his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92146 - 2013-01-28
COURT OF APPEALS
(1). The Town did not waive the slope requirement for Oltman’s proposed driveways and denied her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
(1). The Town did not waive the slope requirement for Oltman’s proposed driveways and denied her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33851 - 2008-08-27
[PDF]
Jeannine M.C. v. Michael A.C.
of paternity. The mother did not dispute that Michael was the father and consequently on March 10, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9979 - 2017-09-19
of paternity. The mother did not dispute that Michael was the father and consequently on March 10, 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9979 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Scott F. Strerath
to a blood test; Strerath stated that he was afraid of needles and did not want to watch the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19
to a blood test; Strerath stated that he was afraid of needles and did not want to watch the process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2645 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court’s colloquy was defective because it did not clarify that “a defendant pleading to disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21
court’s colloquy was defective because it did not clarify that “a defendant pleading to disorderly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026471 - 2025-10-21