Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38131 - 38140 of 50122 for our.
Search results 38131 - 38140 of 50122 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
and now we’re not unanimous on the Count 2 [disorderly conduct]. Does our decision for the first count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42481 - 2009-10-21
and now we’re not unanimous on the Count 2 [disorderly conduct]. Does our decision for the first count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42481 - 2009-10-21
State v. Frank Machado
it is the underpinning for our holding that the majority of Machado's claims are barred. In February 1994, Machado filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8993 - 2005-03-31
it is the underpinning for our holding that the majority of Machado's claims are barred. In February 1994, Machado filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of this issue would lack arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261873 - 2020-05-27
of this issue would lack arguable merit. Our independent review of the record does not disclose any other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261873 - 2020-05-27
Ralph W. Hutchens, Sr. v. Daniel R. Simonson
the bog meets the lake rather than where the land meets the bog. ¶15 Our conclusion is further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
the bog meets the lake rather than where the land meets the bog. ¶15 Our conclusion is further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7495 - 2005-03-31
WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP297-CR Complete Title ...
courts in the seating of impartial juries that represent a broad cross-section of our communities. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91765 - 2013-02-25
courts in the seating of impartial juries that represent a broad cross-section of our communities. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91765 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cause and our standard of review, and therefore we do not repeat them here. ¶3 As to the OWI, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
cause and our standard of review, and therefore we do not repeat them here. ¶3 As to the OWI, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83627 - 2014-09-15
State v. Anthony A. Parker
or, alternatively, is a new factor meriting sentence modification. By our count, this is Parker’s fourth attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
or, alternatively, is a new factor meriting sentence modification. By our count, this is Parker’s fourth attempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2673 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional as applied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
, the mandatory minimum sentence was unconstitutional as applied. Based upon our review of the briefs
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709693 - 2023-10-04
[PDF]
State v. Vincent Simpson
, Simpson also claims the trial court scared him or coerced him into taking the plea. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8960 - 2017-09-19
, Simpson also claims the trial court scared him or coerced him into taking the plea. Our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8960 - 2017-09-19
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Because of our disposition of this matter we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31
will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Because of our disposition of this matter we need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11514 - 2005-03-31