Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 68274 for did.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 68274 for did.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that it was best for Erb to have his rehabilitation happen while he was in custody, the court did not limit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
that it was best for Erb to have his rehabilitation happen while he was in custody, the court did not limit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104706 - 2017-09-21
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104706 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Franklin A. Barton
that he reviewed the substance of the PSI with Barton and that Barton did not tell him to correct any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
that he reviewed the substance of the PSI with Barton and that Barton did not tell him to correct any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7740 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was on supervision for very serious crimes. His immediate testing and breaking of his rules did not bode well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
was on supervision for very serious crimes. His immediate testing and breaking of his rules did not bode well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183376 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles B. Dietzen
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
inlets for the anticipated flow. The Glaums also asserted discretionary immunity did not bar claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45896 - 2014-09-15
inlets for the anticipated flow. The Glaums also asserted discretionary immunity did not bar claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45896 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
393, but the motion and a subsequent reconsideration motion were denied. Grant did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
393, but the motion and a subsequent reconsideration motion were denied. Grant did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
if the evidence did not contribute to the guilty verdicts. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶60, 277 Wis. 2d 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30172 - 2014-09-15
if the evidence did not contribute to the guilty verdicts. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶60, 277 Wis. 2d 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that the court’s written order granting summary judgment did not specify the grounds for the court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96946 - 2014-09-15
that the court’s written order granting summary judgment did not specify the grounds for the court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96946 - 2014-09-15