Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 68502 for did.
Town of East Troy v. Village of Mukwonago
of Mukwonago’s (Village) annexation of four parcels of land. The trial court did not err in its decision to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4874 - 2005-03-31
of Mukwonago’s (Village) annexation of four parcels of land. The trial court did not err in its decision to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4874 - 2005-03-31
Town of East Troy v. Village of Mukwonago
of Mukwonago’s (Village) annexation of four parcels of land. The trial court did not err in its decision to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4873 - 2005-03-31
of Mukwonago’s (Village) annexation of four parcels of land. The trial court did not err in its decision to deny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adopted son did not constitute serious permanent disfigurement under the statutes. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67959 - 2014-09-15
adopted son did not constitute serious permanent disfigurement under the statutes. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67959 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the outcome of the case. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
in the outcome of the case. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06(1). Fant’s sentence modification motion did not reference § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 974.06(1). Fant’s sentence modification motion did not reference § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38434 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
. They didn’t go out looking for you. You went off and did this. You created a crime, injured somebody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
. They didn’t go out looking for you. You went off and did this. You created a crime, injured somebody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. James D. Curtis
to the substitution motion as untimely. Judge Kremers did not rule on the motion, and set a trial schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
to the substitution motion as untimely. Judge Kremers did not rule on the motion, and set a trial schedule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11094 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
The complaint in Gilbert v. Geiger, supra, did not allege a cause of action for which there was the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
The complaint in Gilbert v. Geiger, supra, did not allege a cause of action for which there was the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70333 - 2011-10-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends the Department of Corrections did not commence revocation proceedings until after the expiration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96635 - 2014-09-15
contends the Department of Corrections did not commence revocation proceedings until after the expiration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96635 - 2014-09-15