Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 58867 for do.
Search results 38141 - 38150 of 58867 for do.
COURT OF APPEALS
, in sentencing, the court considered the relevant factors listed in the guideline, even if it was not doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04
, in sentencing, the court considered the relevant factors listed in the guideline, even if it was not doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35457 - 2009-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. Merrill argues that it was premature to conclude Cullen-Smith was the prevailing party because doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31428 - 2008-01-09
. Merrill argues that it was premature to conclude Cullen-Smith was the prevailing party because doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31428 - 2008-01-09
State v. Rochelle L. Oestreich
and sentence modification hearings regarding Oestreich’s receipt of AFDC for her four children, e.g.: Where do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
and sentence modification hearings regarding Oestreich’s receipt of AFDC for her four children, e.g.: Where do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to extend the proceedings, the court found good cause to do so, and R.A.R. did not object. There would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179419 - 2017-09-21
to extend the proceedings, the court found good cause to do so, and R.A.R. did not object. There would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179419 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the written judgment and oral pronouncement do not conflict. Second, unlike Oglesby, an examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131740 - 2014-12-16
the written judgment and oral pronouncement do not conflict. Second, unlike Oglesby, an examination
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131740 - 2014-12-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court misused its sentencing discretion. We agree with appellate counsel that these issues do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
court misused its sentencing discretion. We agree with appellate counsel that these issues do
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108136 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107969 - 2017-09-21
, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Wirth v. Ehly, 93 Wis. 2d 433
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107969 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for successor counsel for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. In doing so, we consider the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015428 - 2025-10-01
for successor counsel for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. In doing so, we consider the adequacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1015428 - 2025-10-01
Rashid A. Osman v. Allen R. Phipps
by an insurer authorized to do an automobile liability insurance or surety business in this state. The bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14624 - 2005-03-31
by an insurer authorized to do an automobile liability insurance or surety business in this state. The bond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14624 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143206 - 2015-06-23