Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38151 - 38160 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 38151 - 38160 of 62306 for child support.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proper, and whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdicts. We conclude no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
proper, and whether there was sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdicts. We conclude no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181359 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ricky McMorris
? The answer is equally clear and succinct and it does not support the trial court's ruling. “[A] post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
? The answer is equally clear and succinct and it does not support the trial court's ruling. “[A] post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9434 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Jenkins insists that there were no exigent circumstances that supported the warrantless entry of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49944 - 2014-09-15
. Jenkins insists that there were no exigent circumstances that supported the warrantless entry of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49944 - 2014-09-15
State v. David M. Mosel
it was not supported by probable cause. The State responded that Mosel was not under arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
it was not supported by probable cause. The State responded that Mosel was not under arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10848 - 2005-03-31
State v. Constantine F. Weimer
of the evidence to support a conviction, this court will affirm the conviction unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
of the evidence to support a conviction, this court will affirm the conviction unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19094 - 2005-07-25
State v. Lee Raven
an allegedly exculpatory audio recording of the incident; (4) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25262 - 2006-05-24
an allegedly exculpatory audio recording of the incident; (4) the evidence was insufficient to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25262 - 2006-05-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record does not support. The first assumption is that the circuit court, in sentencing on the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
that the record does not support. The first assumption is that the circuit court, in sentencing on the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529825 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties. 7 This conclusion is supported by the court notice sent to all parties that scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
of the parties. 7 This conclusion is supported by the court notice sent to all parties that scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Although Rivera testified, he did not present trial counsel’s testimony in support of his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
. Although Rivera testified, he did not present trial counsel’s testimony in support of his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
payment which was due on August 15, 2008. The affidavit did not include any facts supporting the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41686 - 2014-09-15
payment which was due on August 15, 2008. The affidavit did not include any facts supporting the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41686 - 2014-09-15