Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38151 - 38160 of 68274 for did.
Search results 38151 - 38160 of 68274 for did.
State v. Charles B. Dietzen
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
inlets for the anticipated flow. The Glaums also asserted discretionary immunity did not bar claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45896 - 2014-09-15
inlets for the anticipated flow. The Glaums also asserted discretionary immunity did not bar claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45896 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
393, but the motion and a subsequent reconsideration motion were denied. Grant did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
393, but the motion and a subsequent reconsideration motion were denied. Grant did not appeal. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127192 - 2014-11-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
if the evidence did not contribute to the guilty verdicts. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶60, 277 Wis. 2d 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30172 - 2014-09-15
if the evidence did not contribute to the guilty verdicts. See State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶60, 277 Wis. 2d 593
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30172 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that the court’s written order granting summary judgment did not specify the grounds for the court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96946 - 2014-09-15
that the court’s written order granting summary judgment did not specify the grounds for the court’s decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96946 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
concurrent with count one. The court did not order a fine, restitution, or a DNA surcharge, and it found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
concurrent with count one. The court did not order a fine, restitution, or a DNA surcharge, and it found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145051 - 2015-07-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
to apply the “least punishment” principle and to explain why it did not order a lesser sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15
to apply the “least punishment” principle and to explain why it did not order a lesser sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Kurt W. Reise v. Kay Morlen
was insufficient because she is not an interested party 4 and did not request the appointment of a guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4545 - 2017-09-20
was insufficient because she is not an interested party 4 and did not request the appointment of a guardian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4545 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Clearly it did not result in a 2 Alford also fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497912 - 2022-03-23
.” Clearly it did not result in a 2 Alford also fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=497912 - 2022-03-23