Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38161 - 38170 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

State v. Calvin Shields
). “The question of what constitutes reasonableness is a commonsense test which considers what a reasonable police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15493 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kevin H. Gillson
, 210 Wis.2d 115, 125, 565 N.W.2d 168, 172 (Ct. App. 1997). In applying this test, we weigh the effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13341 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Marvin Gauger v. Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company
, 691, 271 N.W.2d 368, 376 (1978). The first prong of this test is objective, while the second prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8535 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert Hoffa, Jr.
to enter a plea. Though the tests are different, we dispose of the appeal on the merits and therefore need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13030 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Raymond Ludwikowski v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
-reported symptoms and limitations and that he believes that further testing is necessary before a final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9421 - 2017-09-19

City of Madison v. Duke M. Jawara
for a blood test, which yielded a result of 0.14 g/100 ml. ¶4 Jawara did not contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3689 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 12
, V. NHIA LEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326021 - 2021-04-26

[PDF] -CR and 2017AP2361; added oral argument dates for March 2020
Miller v. Kim, 191 Wis. 2d 187, 528 N.W.2d 72 (Ct. App. 1995) be reversed by this Court in order
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253576 - 2020-02-04

[PDF] WI App 70
an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: CLARE L. FIORENZA, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224146 - 2018-12-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, J. A., RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269505 - 2020-07-20