Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38171 - 38180 of 62306 for child support.
Search results 38171 - 38180 of 62306 for child support.
State v. Ritchie H. Dumer
and involuntary, and that there was an inadequate factual basis to support his pleas. After a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
and involuntary, and that there was an inadequate factual basis to support his pleas. After a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7721 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lillian McKee v. Price County
the brief. See RULE 809.83(2), STATS. A reviewing court need not sift the record for facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12391 - 2017-09-21
the brief. See RULE 809.83(2), STATS. A reviewing court need not sift the record for facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12391 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
if it applies an improper legal standard or makes a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112361 - 2014-05-14
if it applies an improper legal standard or makes a decision not reasonably supported by the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112361 - 2014-05-14
State v. Raymond D. Shaw
if it refuses to submit an instruction on an issue that is supported by the evidence. See id. at 208, 477 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31
if it refuses to submit an instruction on an issue that is supported by the evidence. See id. at 208, 477 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11726 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not reasonably supported by the facts of record. Id. “Because the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141811 - 2017-09-21
not reasonably supported by the facts of record. Id. “Because the exercise of discretion is so essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The Heurings argue the undisputed facts do not support immunity. We disagree. ¶9 The first element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49918 - 2014-09-15
. The Heurings argue the undisputed facts do not support immunity. We disagree. ¶9 The first element
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49918 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the officer’s testimony would not support a finding or a reasonable inference that Feldman’s weak blow skewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
that the officer’s testimony would not support a finding or a reasonable inference that Feldman’s weak blow skewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25
09AP2918-CR State v. Dale W. Jenkins
circumstances that supported the warrantless entry of two Fond du Lac county sheriff’s deputies onto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49944 - 2010-05-18
circumstances that supported the warrantless entry of two Fond du Lac county sheriff’s deputies onto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49944 - 2010-05-18
[PDF]
Gregory T. Isermann v. Elizabeth A. Isermann
, stating in her supporting affidavit, “In our divorce trial, there has been extensive testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6144 - 2017-09-19
, stating in her supporting affidavit, “In our divorce trial, there has been extensive testimony regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6144 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. James E. Janssen
relies instead upon additional testimony given at the suppression hearing as support for his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11897 - 2017-09-21
relies instead upon additional testimony given at the suppression hearing as support for his claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11897 - 2017-09-21