Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 62336 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
Rittenhouse’s allegations, if true, would support a claim for promissory estoppel, Rittenhouse has created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32965 - 2008-06-09
Rittenhouse’s allegations, if true, would support a claim for promissory estoppel, Rittenhouse has created
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32965 - 2008-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
discrimination and deprived it of due process and equal protection. In support of its claims, Villa alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31470 - 2008-01-09
discrimination and deprived it of due process and equal protection. In support of its claims, Villa alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31470 - 2008-01-09
[PDF]
State v. Ricky McMorris
not support the trial court's ruling. “[A] post-indictment pretrial lineup at which the accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9434 - 2017-09-19
not support the trial court's ruling. “[A] post-indictment pretrial lineup at which the accused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9434 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jamal D. Jones
first argument, the record does contain a statement which, if taken out of context, would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9217 - 2017-09-19
first argument, the record does contain a statement which, if taken out of context, would support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9217 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Frank Jude Steffes
to support an investigatory stop. Steffes subsequently entered a plea to operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
to support an investigatory stop. Steffes subsequently entered a plea to operating a motor vehicle while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6232 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dorian V. Neal
support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating to Juror 78. No. 99-2138 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15878 - 2017-09-21
support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating to Juror 78. No. 99-2138 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Tucker mischaracterizes the testimony in question. There is absolutely no support in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218229 - 2018-08-28
Tucker mischaracterizes the testimony in question. There is absolutely no support in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218229 - 2018-08-28
COURT OF APPEALS
to accomplish the goals of the law, and Hechimovich does not cite authority supporting such a rule. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
to accomplish the goals of the law, and Hechimovich does not cite authority supporting such a rule. ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62519 - 2011-04-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, purely conclusory, and not supported by any specific facts. Moreover, the record conclusively refutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27
, purely conclusory, and not supported by any specific facts. Moreover, the record conclusively refutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446258 - 2021-10-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not supported by probable cause. We conclude the detention was reasonable and there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26846 - 2014-09-15
was not supported by probable cause. We conclude the detention was reasonable and there was probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26846 - 2014-09-15