Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 57150 for id.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 57150 for id.
Barbara Ellis v. City of Reedsburg
rights by the action taken. Id. at 407-08, 479 N.W.2d at 922. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8099 - 2005-03-31
rights by the action taken. Id. at 407-08, 479 N.W.2d at 922. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8099 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
State v. Tito Quixte Grimes
in Nelson [v. State, 54 Wis.2d 489, 195 N.W.2d 629 (1972).][1] Id. at 310-11, 548 NW.2d at 53 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10539 - 2005-03-31
in Nelson [v. State, 54 Wis.2d 489, 195 N.W.2d 629 (1972).][1] Id. at 310-11, 548 NW.2d at 53 (citations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10539 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law, we review the question independently.” Id. Here, the circuit court’s grant of declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158273 - 2017-09-21
of law, we review the question independently.” Id. Here, the circuit court’s grant of declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158273 - 2017-09-21
Waupaca County Department of Human Services v. Jennifer M.A.
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
of a statute, our review is de novo. Id. Wisconsin Stat. § 48.426 reads: (1) Court considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6441 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and under the same criteria, as the initial stop. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49237 - 2010-04-27
, and under the same criteria, as the initial stop. Id. “The question of what constitutes reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49237 - 2010-04-27
Craig D. Hanson v. Kathryn M. Hanson
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts.” Id. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12306 - 2005-03-31
process based on the application of the correct legal standards to the record facts.” Id. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12306 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Id. (quoting State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 253, 557 N.W.2d 245 (1996)); see also Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86357 - 2014-09-15
.’” Id. (quoting State v. Harris, 206 Wis. 2d 243, 253, 557 N.W.2d 245 (1996)); see also Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86357 - 2014-09-15
Dillard Earl Kelley, Sr. v. State
a correctly addressed petition to the proper prison authorities for mailing.” Id. at ¶1. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5319 - 2005-03-31
a correctly addressed petition to the proper prison authorities for mailing.” Id. at ¶1. The supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5319 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alan D. Eisenberg v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
for the contemnor to apologize, defend or explain the contumacious behavior.” Id. at 434, 533 N.W.2d at 825
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13357 - 2017-09-21
for the contemnor to apologize, defend or explain the contumacious behavior.” Id. at 434, 533 N.W.2d at 825
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13357 - 2017-09-21