Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 59650 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 38181 - 38190 of 59650 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
of methamphetamine with intent to deliver and an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
not report this contact to his release agent, although he did report it to his “monitor” and claims to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29204 - 2014-09-15
not report this contact to his release agent, although he did report it to his “monitor” and claims to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nancy A. Webb v. Andrew J. Webb
claims that the trial court erred in its valuation of the marital estate and that it should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3076 - 2017-09-19
claims that the trial court erred in its valuation of the marital estate and that it should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3076 - 2017-09-19
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
the termination of her parental rights to her four children.[2] Connie raises three arguments, each claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
the termination of her parental rights to her four children.[2] Connie raises three arguments, each claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2355 - 2005-03-31
Brown County Human Services Department v. Connie D.
the termination of her parental rights to her four children.[2] Connie raises three arguments, each claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
the termination of her parental rights to her four children.[2] Connie raises three arguments, each claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and is not a direct consequence of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218613 - 2018-09-05
and is not a direct consequence of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218613 - 2018-09-05
CA Blank Order
a potential claim that the court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. We agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
a potential claim that the court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing. We agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
[PDF]
Sally R. Dix v. John Patrick Styer
supports the injunction. Next, we reject Styer's claim that the trial court erroneously limited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11708 - 2017-09-20
supports the injunction. Next, we reject Styer's claim that the trial court erroneously limited his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11708 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Chad T. Maxon
, he claims that there was not probable cause to stop and arrest him. Second, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3176 - 2017-09-19
, he claims that there was not probable cause to stop and arrest him. Second, he asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3176 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged with armed burglary, and someone else—here, he alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62865 - 2011-04-18
fundamental claim is that: (1) he was never charged with armed burglary, and someone else—here, he alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62865 - 2011-04-18

