Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3821 - 3830 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
Search results 3821 - 3830 of 30032 for consulta de causas.
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, and “[a] party is entitled to summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53088 - 2013-03-26
judgment de novo, and “[a] party is entitled to summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53088 - 2013-03-26
Village of DeForest v. County of Dane
We review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10901 - 2005-03-31
We review the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10901 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346241 - 2021-03-16
entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id. (emphasis added). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346241 - 2021-03-16
Jonas Doyle Carter v. Crystal Marie Carter
the difference in the division is de minimus, a deviation from the presumption of a fifty-fifty division did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7442 - 2005-03-31
the difference in the division is de minimus, a deviation from the presumption of a fifty-fifty division did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7442 - 2005-03-31
Milwaukee Police Association v. The City of Milwaukee
of this appeal were decided on summary judgment and present only issues of law. Accordingly, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12247 - 2005-03-31
of this appeal were decided on summary judgment and present only issues of law. Accordingly, our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12247 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Royal C. Neumann v. Town of Waukesha
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7816 - 2017-09-19
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7816 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Royal C. Neumann v. Town of Waukesha
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7817 - 2017-09-19
permit for a commercial PUD in a residential district was a “de facto rezoning” of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7817 - 2017-09-19
96 CV 1749 William A. Pangman v. Richard William King
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14075 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: robert De Chambeau, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14075 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of review. ¶14 Jahimiak suggests that our review is de novo because it involves the construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63998 - 2011-05-11
of review. ¶14 Jahimiak suggests that our review is de novo because it involves the construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63998 - 2011-05-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the evidence.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29838 - 2014-09-15
on the evidence.” State ex rel. Smits v. City of De Pere, 104 Wis. 2d 26, 31, 310 N.W.2d 607, 609 (1981); see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29838 - 2014-09-15