Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3821 - 3830 of 29942 for des.

COURT OF APPEALS
is reasonable and whether more than one reasonable inference may be drawn are questions of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74765 - 2011-12-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
disagree on the standard of review that we should apply. Watkins argues that we should apply a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256036 - 2020-03-10

COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, and “[a] party is entitled to summary judgment if there are no genuine issues of material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53088 - 2010-08-09

WI APP 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2256 2012AP2257 Comple...
during the “first-in” period. We review de novo the legal issues decided by the circuit court. See Loth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98257 - 2014-03-09

2009 WI APP 118
exists in a plea agreement is a question of law we decide de novo. See id. at 349. ¶13 We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36880 - 2009-08-25

Sara A. Tridle v. Grace G. Horn
competency to proceed, a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Bollig, 222 Wis. 2d 558, 563, 587
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4703 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Id. ¶19 As a general matter, the decision to stop an automobile is reasonable where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31959 - 2008-02-27

State v. Daniel J. Beck
. Personal jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo. Marsh v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 179
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10566 - 2005-03-31

Town of Grand Chute v. Outagamie County
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Outagamie County: john a. des jardins, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6682 - 2005-03-31

Beverly Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
to suit.” II. ¶12 Our review of the trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5365 - 2005-03-31