Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3821 - 3830 of 6110 for sheriff.
Search results 3821 - 3830 of 6110 for sheriff.
WI App 48 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP933 Complete Title of ...
the lie detector test had to be taken at Sand Ridge and not the local sheriff’s department. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79440 - 2012-04-24
the lie detector test had to be taken at Sand Ridge and not the local sheriff’s department. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79440 - 2012-04-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jason E. Fladhammer
County Sheriff’s Department investigator testified that Fladhammer had admitted to entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
County Sheriff’s Department investigator testified that Fladhammer had admitted to entering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4985 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sheriff assigned to freeway traffic enforcement noticed a vehicle (later identified as being driven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
sheriff assigned to freeway traffic enforcement noticed a vehicle (later identified as being driven
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806858 - 2024-05-29
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the center console, and Schartner contacted the sheriff’s department. Schartner was advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58922 - 2014-09-15
of the center console, and Schartner contacted the sheriff’s department. Schartner was advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58922 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Rusk County Sheriff’s Deputy Dan Glaze from a bullet fired by Nitek which went through Glaze’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617084 - 2023-01-31
of Rusk County Sheriff’s Deputy Dan Glaze from a bullet fired by Nitek which went through Glaze’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617084 - 2023-01-31
State v. Leroy W. Senn
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene of the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene of the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Knutson
with this opinion. background ¶2 The Lincoln County Sheriff’s Department received an anonymous call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
with this opinion. background ¶2 The Lincoln County Sheriff’s Department received an anonymous call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3163 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial because the Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Department failed to preserve exculpatory evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
a mistrial because the Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Department failed to preserve exculpatory evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23