Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38201 - 38210 of 50524 for our.
Search results 38201 - 38210 of 50524 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
and Bullock had a joint trial, and therefore we take the trial facts from our opinion in State v. Bullock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
and Bullock had a joint trial, and therefore we take the trial facts from our opinion in State v. Bullock
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2013-03-25
MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. The State of Wisconsin
a rational basis. Id. at 662, 539 N.W.2d at 103. Because of our conclusion that the statute is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
a rational basis. Id. at 662, 539 N.W.2d at 103. Because of our conclusion that the statute is ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8857 - 2005-03-31
Michael S. Elkins v. Gary McCaughtry
in this action as of November 30, 2001. ¶26 Our review of the record failed to produce either an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
in this action as of November 30, 2001. ¶26 Our review of the record failed to produce either an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5279 - 2005-03-31
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
that our analysis must begin with § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., which provides: Sentence credit. (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
that our analysis must begin with § 973.155(1)(a), Stats., which provides: Sentence credit. (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9012 - 2005-03-31
Synthia O'Grady v. Michael S. O'Grady
and discharged the guardian ad litem. O’Grady’s appeal follows. ¶16 Additional facts will be set out in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
and discharged the guardian ad litem. O’Grady’s appeal follows. ¶16 Additional facts will be set out in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18370 - 2005-05-31
2008 WI APP 52
is a question of fact. Painter, 265 Wis. 2d 248, ¶17. We do not substitute our judgment for the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32233 - 2008-03-24
is a question of fact. Painter, 265 Wis. 2d 248, ¶17. We do not substitute our judgment for the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32233 - 2008-03-24
Leslie L. Kuper v. Craig A. Kuper
was not and for our purposes, is not known. What is known is that Leslie unilaterally decided to breach her agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2504 - 2005-03-31
was not and for our purposes, is not known. What is known is that Leslie unilaterally decided to breach her agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2504 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
quotation marks and quoted sources omitted). Our review is de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶19 Here, Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2012-03-11
quotation marks and quoted sources omitted). Our review is de novo. See id., ¶9. ¶19 Here, Russell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132030 - 2012-03-11
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶28 Our review of sentencing decisions is well-settled. “The trial court has great discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2008-03-26
. ¶28 Our review of sentencing decisions is well-settled. “The trial court has great discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56204 - 2008-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Jessie L. Redmond
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Our review focuses on whether the errors cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8820 - 2017-09-19
sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome. Id. Our review focuses on whether the errors cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8820 - 2017-09-19