Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38221 - 38230 of 57351 for id.

[PDF] State v. James E. Goodman
that a reasonable judge could reach.” Id. However, we interpret statutes without deference to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25089 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
unchallengeable. Id. at 690-91. To establish prejudice, Aguirre must show a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31404 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of historical or evidentiary fact unless they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶33
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257973 - 2020-04-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
id., ¶8. Thus, even assuming that the staff’s reports and Anthony R.’s file constitute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101725 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
or capricious. Id. at 74. “Arbitrary or capricious conduct lacks a rational basis and is the result
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128512 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. If the motion fails to allege sufficient facts, the circuit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161497 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hearing by following one or a combination of several methods. Id., 131 Wis. 2d at 267-68. One
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675657 - 2023-07-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law, we review the question independently.” Id. Here, the circuit court’s grant of declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158273 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly erroneous. Id., ¶27. “[W]e review the two- pronged determination of trial counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171869 - 2017-09-21

State v. Richard V. Stiglitz
violated. Id. at 483. The State argued that requiring the juvenile court to vacate a consent decree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3118 - 2005-03-31