Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38231 - 38240 of 83320 for case search.
Search results 38231 - 38240 of 83320 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. Kevin J. McKillion
27, 2004, these cases were consolidated for briefing and dispositional purposes. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24622 - 2017-09-21
27, 2004, these cases were consolidated for briefing and dispositional purposes. Nos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24622 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Everardo A. Lopez
2001 WI App 265 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3070-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3256 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 265 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3070-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3256 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 107
2008 WI 107 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2430-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33572 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI 107 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP2430-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33572 - 2014-09-15
Dorothy Ann Metz v. Theodore James Keener
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1443-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12497 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 97-1443-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12497 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eduardo Alicea
Castro’s car. Neither victim testified at the trial, and the State’s case rested on the testimony of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
Castro’s car. Neither victim testified at the trial, and the State’s case rested on the testimony of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4907 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the treasury. We conclude that the present case is factually and legally indistinguishable from Wells v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31952 - 2008-02-27
the treasury. We conclude that the present case is factually and legally indistinguishable from Wells v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31952 - 2008-02-27
Sandra Lynn Modrow v. Kim Jerome Modrow
2001 WI App 200 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-1868 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2794 - 2005-03-31
2001 WI App 200 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 00-1868 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2794 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the information in this case, and I understand what I am charged with, what the penalties are and why I have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27532 - 2014-09-15
and the information in this case, and I understand what I am charged with, what the penalties are and why I have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27532 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 142
2007 WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1240-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
2007 WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP1240-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28883 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a speedy trial; (2) trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever his case from Watkins’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677698 - 2023-07-11
to a speedy trial; (2) trial counsel was ineffective for not moving to sever his case from Watkins’ case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=677698 - 2023-07-11