Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38231 - 38240 of 44730 for part.
Search results 38231 - 38240 of 44730 for part.
[PDF]
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
in part: “The department may make the report available to other agencies or persons to use for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
in part: “The department may make the report available to other agencies or persons to use for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a three-part petition for a John Doe hearing. This petition was denied, and Hammersley’s subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
a three-part petition for a John Doe hearing. This petition was denied, and Hammersley’s subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=747814 - 2024-01-04
[PDF]
Luis Santana v. Jeffrey P. Endicott
part: Such petition must be verified and must state in substance: (1) That the person in whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
part: Such petition must be verified and must state in substance: (1) That the person in whose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20592 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the testimony of any expert, including accepting only parts of an expert’s testimony; and to consider all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
the testimony of any expert, including accepting only parts of an expert’s testimony; and to consider all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38808 - 2009-08-03
State v. Jason J.C.
, entitled “Initial applicability; circuit courts” provides in part: (3) Substitution of a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
, entitled “Initial applicability; circuit courts” provides in part: (3) Substitution of a judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12425 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it was “a video [defense counsel had] never seen before. It is not part of that Snapchat story that [defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
it was “a video [defense counsel had] never seen before. It is not part of that Snapchat story that [defense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907053 - 2025-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.” See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e), (3)(a)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798543 - 2024-05-09
to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.” See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.19(1)(d)-(e), (3)(a)2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798543 - 2024-05-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
over any part of the plea questionnaire form other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290262 - 2020-09-23
over any part of the plea questionnaire form other than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290262 - 2020-09-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel. Hoffman claimed, in part, that trial counsel failed to inform him that under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
assistance of counsel. Hoffman claimed, in part, that trial counsel failed to inform him that under State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907144 - 2025-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
response by the witness. Out of the presence of the jury, S.M.F. moved for a mistrial. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269872 - 2020-07-15
response by the witness. Out of the presence of the jury, S.M.F. moved for a mistrial. As part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269872 - 2020-07-15