Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38251 - 38260 of 62360 for child support.
Search results 38251 - 38260 of 62360 for child support.
State v. Juan Mata
at 368 (emphasis added). These cases are arguably in conflict. Secrist appears to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14602 - 2005-03-31
at 368 (emphasis added). These cases are arguably in conflict. Secrist appears to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
brief-in-chief. The State cited to Arberry in its response brief to support its argument, yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222238 - 2018-10-16
brief-in-chief. The State cited to Arberry in its response brief to support its argument, yet
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222238 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
State v. Calvin R. Herzog
to support its “plain view” holding is clearly erroneous. And while we recognize that we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
to support its “plain view” holding is clearly erroneous. And while we recognize that we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addresses whether there would be any arguable merit to a claim that the verdicts were not supported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253393 - 2020-01-31
addresses whether there would be any arguable merit to a claim that the verdicts were not supported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253393 - 2020-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Although Rivera testified, he did not present trial counsel’s testimony in support of his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
. Although Rivera testified, he did not present trial counsel’s testimony in support of his ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386047 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and scheduled the preliminary hearing.2 The record supports the trial court’s determination. Any challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92228 - 2014-09-15
and scheduled the preliminary hearing.2 The record supports the trial court’s determination. Any challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92228 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dorian V. Neal
support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating to Juror 78. No. 99-2138 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15878 - 2017-09-21
support counsel’s assessment of the issues relating to Juror 78. No. 99-2138 4 ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15878 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the police and lied about driving his car. Support for these facts is summarized above, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124280 - 2017-09-21
the police and lied about driving his car. Support for these facts is summarized above, and I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the parties. 7 This conclusion is supported by the court notice sent to all parties that scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
of the parties. 7 This conclusion is supported by the court notice sent to all parties that scheduled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210579 - 2018-04-04
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Snyder
investigated by the Office of Lawyer Regulation, and that Office's recommendation in support of the request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16478 - 2017-09-21
investigated by the Office of Lawyer Regulation, and that Office's recommendation in support of the request
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16478 - 2017-09-21