Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38261 - 38270 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
Search results 38261 - 38270 of 83471 for case codes/1000.
2010 WI APP 51
2010 WI App 51 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP385-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48247 - 2010-04-25
2010 WI App 51 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2009AP385-CR Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48247 - 2010-04-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=687552 - 2023-08-09
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1030-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2009CF330
motion without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
motion without a hearing. As we explain below, we believe that existing case law suggests two
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77892 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
directly to the standard of review in civil cases. The no- merit procedure is better served by reference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236960 - 2019-03-13
directly to the standard of review in civil cases. The no- merit procedure is better served by reference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236960 - 2019-03-13
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
erred when it barred him from introducing evidence that the Intoximeter used in this case had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark C. Laska v. Mary Jane Laska
2002 WI App 132 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0022-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 132 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0022-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15