Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Sujan Singh Chada v. First Specialty Insurance Corporation
court erred when it concluded that the case must be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12835 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it concluded that the case must be dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Joel D. Schaalma v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
is in addition to any other increase payable under s. 102.53 but, for cases in which an injury causes more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4646 - 2017-09-19
is in addition to any other increase payable under s. 102.53 but, for cases in which an injury causes more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4646 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
dismissing Gladney’s case with prejudice. The order provided that, for the reasons set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
dismissing Gladney’s case with prejudice. The order provided that, for the reasons set forth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=470379 - 2022-01-11
COURT OF APPEALS
took off in the middle of last night to avoid being here for this case. The State argued that Simpson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112225 - 2014-05-12
took off in the middle of last night to avoid being here for this case. The State argued that Simpson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112225 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
State v. Luis Vasquez
and shot Erickson. No. 01-1119-CR 3 ¶3 The State’s case was based primarily on Berrisford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
and shot Erickson. No. 01-1119-CR 3 ¶3 The State’s case was based primarily on Berrisford’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3886 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jason D. VanStraten
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6881 - 2017-09-20
machine; however, the court stated: “No, you have put your case in .… It’s too late.” The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6881 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
was ineffective for failing to argue to the circuit court that it should have dismissed the case instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
CA Blank Order
of this case to the sentencing factors and reached a result that was both reasoned and reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-07-01
of this case to the sentencing factors and reached a result that was both reasoned and reasonable. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98819 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=943969 - 2025-04-22
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
tried the case to “a draw” and that therefore the City had failed to prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
tried the case to “a draw” and that therefore the City had failed to prove its case by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31