Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Based upon our review of the parties’ submissions and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1002913 - 2025-08-27
Based upon our review of the parties’ submissions and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1002913 - 2025-08-27
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
erroneously denied his motion to dismiss the case on double jeopardy grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35622 - 2009-02-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. 230, 236-37, 34 N.W. 139 (1887). In the present case, an employee of the Department of Administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
. 230, 236-37, 34 N.W. 139 (1887). In the present case, an employee of the Department of Administration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82382 - 2012-05-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
charges, if proven at a hearing, would entitle him to withdraw his plea. That would not be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33804 - 2014-09-15
charges, if proven at a hearing, would entitle him to withdraw his plea. That would not be the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33804 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and sentencing hearing. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 1998CF3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
and sentencing hearing. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2 In Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 1998CF3215
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33531 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeremy J. Ramirez
in [the OWI case], the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction in this case. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6360 - 2005-03-31
in [the OWI case], the evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction in this case. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6360 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134107 - 2015-01-28
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134107 - 2015-01-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a blood-alcohol content of almost .3. The case was tried to a jury, and Montague was found guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
a blood-alcohol content of almost .3. The case was tried to a jury, and Montague was found guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, another charge of theft was dismissed and read in. Another case in which Olsen was charged with felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
, another charge of theft was dismissed and read in. Another case in which Olsen was charged with felony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121153 - 2014-09-08
State v. Robert Anthony Joshua
In 1991, Joshua had been sentenced in circuit court case No. F-903525.[1] In that case, the court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18454 - 2005-06-06
In 1991, Joshua had been sentenced in circuit court case No. F-903525.[1] In that case, the court imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18454 - 2005-06-06