Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83487 for case codes/1000.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83487 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=947819 - 2025-04-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15
confinement pursuant to § 302.11(1g) is a new factor in this case. We disagree. ¶7 WISCONSIN STAT. § 302.11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97905 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark C. Laska v. Mary Jane Laska
2002 WI App 132 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0022-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
2002 WI App 132 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0022-FT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4790 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
prejudicial testimony. Specifically, Amanda argues that a statement from the children’s case worker during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88561 - 2014-09-15
State v. Cory T. Baker
but not that many casings were found. An evidentiary hearing was held. Appellate counsel, trial counsel and Baker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7361 - 2005-03-31
but not that many casings were found. An evidentiary hearing was held. Appellate counsel, trial counsel and Baker
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7361 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
unit located above the Seegers’ unit. The court case proceedings spanned three days, during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13
unit located above the Seegers’ unit. The court case proceedings spanned three days, during which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48942 - 2010-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consecutive to a sentence he was serving in connection with a conviction in a Dane County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
consecutive to a sentence he was serving in connection with a conviction in a Dane County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=671289 - 2023-06-28
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Gary McCaughtry
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
the record has been returned. ¶9 In support of this argument, the respondents cite two cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16293 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05
at No. 2022AP1770 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05