Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83973 for case search.
Search results 38271 - 38280 of 83973 for case search.
[PDF]
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
Supreme Court decided the Howard case. On April 2, 1998, acting pro se, Thornton filed another WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3997 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, the earlier version of § 973.01 addressed in both cases applied only to felonies.[3] Both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42994 - 2009-11-02
. However, the earlier version of § 973.01 addressed in both cases applied only to felonies.[3] Both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42994 - 2009-11-02
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
State v. Henry A. Phillips
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
. It is therefore necessary for this court to sua sponte extend the deadline for a decision in this case. See WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182782 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
, we agree, and reverse. BACKGROUND ¶2 The relevant facts in this case are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=516016 - 2022-05-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
, JJ. No. 2009AP2412 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
, JJ. No. 2009AP2412 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. This is a worker’s compensation case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55769 - 2014-09-15
State v. Mark H. Price
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
or her impartiality. See id. In this case, however, the trial judge determined that he was impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076929 - 2026-02-18
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076929 - 2026-02-18