Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] State v. Israel Saldana
of law which we review de novo. See id. The right to effective assistance of counsel applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11532 - 2017-09-19

State v. Andre D. Mitchell
review issues of constitutional law de novo, see State v. Lee, 175 Wis.2d 348, 354, 499 N.W.2d 250, 252
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12705 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Leonard A. Sarnowski
. Pharr, 115 Wis. 2d 334, 342, 340 N.W.2d 498, 501 (1983). We review de novo whether that decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7371 - 2017-09-20

State v. James E. Szulczewski
of undisputed facts are questions of law which we review de novo. State v. Rohl, 160 Wis.2d 325, 329, 466 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10802 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Maurice Fort Greer v. Lawrence Stahowiak
review the circuit court’s decision de novo. State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19737 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order de novo, because “the interpretation of an insurance contract and the legal effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142339 - 2015-05-26

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court o...
forth probable cause to justify the charge is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27139 - 2006-11-13

State v. Donald A. Lesavage
). However, whether a set of facts constitutes probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15409 - 2005-03-31

Carol J. Salsbury v. Michael R. Miller
of such a document is generally a de novo review. See Davis v. Nepco Employees Mut. Benefit Ass'n, 51 F.3d 752, 754
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12999 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. To prevail, the defendant must show both that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46549 - 2010-02-02