Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 29942 for des.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 29942 for des.
[PDF]
Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
set of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12145 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to interpret statutes, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Stewart, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082075 - 2026-02-24
to interpret statutes, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Stewart, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1082075 - 2026-02-24
[PDF]
Diane Antczak v. River Hills South Investors
applies to a given set of facts presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. Antczak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
applies to a given set of facts presents a question of law we review de novo. See id. Antczak argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12682 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29504 - 2007-06-27
of Review ¶6 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29504 - 2007-06-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2015AP2618 3 ¶6 Review of an award of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172231 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP2618 3 ¶6 Review of an award of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172231 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
immunity is a question of law we review de novo. See Estate of Brown v. Mathy Constr. Co., 2008 WI App 114
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
immunity is a question of law we review de novo. See Estate of Brown v. Mathy Constr. Co., 2008 WI App 114
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49918 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
restitution given the facts before it is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Kayon, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
restitution given the facts before it is a question of law we review de novo. State v. Kayon, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94791 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
de novo. Hefty v. Strickhouser, 2008 WI 96, ¶27, 312 Wis. 2d 530, 752 N.W.2d 820. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54949 - 2014-09-15
de novo. Hefty v. Strickhouser, 2008 WI 96, ¶27, 312 Wis. 2d 530, 752 N.W.2d 820. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54949 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas J. Trinko
is a question of law that we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393, 515 N.W.2d 337 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24600 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. Socha v. Socha, 183 Wis. 2d 390, 393, 515 N.W.2d 337 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24600 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13
that Boone entered the plea knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is a question of law we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=994951 - 2025-08-13