Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 24556 for extending.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 24556 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
extended supervision. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102596 - 2013-10-02
extended supervision. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102596 - 2013-10-02
CA Blank Order
] The State agreed to recommend three years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
] The State agreed to recommend three years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106473 - 2014-01-07
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement followed by three years’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02
’ initial confinement followed by three years’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28618 - 2007-04-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with an extended magazine and start shooting. The owner was able to point out the shooter on the surveillance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
with an extended magazine and start shooting. The owner was able to point out the shooter on the surveillance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=901380 - 2025-01-22
Shawano County v. Sarah H.
PETERSON, J.[1] Sarah H. appeals from an order extending her involuntary civil commitment in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5204 - 2005-03-31
PETERSON, J.[1] Sarah H. appeals from an order extending her involuntary civil commitment in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5204 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, recommended two to three years each of confinement and extended supervision on the burglary charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112928 - 2017-09-21
, recommended two to three years each of confinement and extended supervision on the burglary charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement with maximum extended supervision of three years); 943.32(2), 973.01(2)(b)3. and (d)2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
confinement with maximum extended supervision of three years); 943.32(2), 973.01(2)(b)3. and (d)2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, reiterating the restitution obligation. This matter is before us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91978 - 2014-09-15
and eighteen months’ extended supervision, reiterating the restitution obligation. This matter is before us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91978 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision; to remain silent regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision; to remain silent regarding
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598174 - 2022-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
of extended supervision. 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23