Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Steven T. Miller
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9136 - 2017-09-19
State v. Steven T. Miller
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
. Miller has responded to the report. On our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9136 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103604 - 2013-10-29
[PDF]
State v. Steven R. Lineberry
. After an independent review of the record, we conclude that the issues identified by counsel lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8653 - 2017-09-19
. After an independent review of the record, we conclude that the issues identified by counsel lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8653 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert Anthony Lee v. C.O. Lutzow
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
is whether the committee provided Lee with due process. We conclude that the record is insufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7952 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
process rights were violated because the No. 2007AP192 2 record did not contain the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
process rights were violated because the No. 2007AP192 2 record did not contain the official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
for dismissal. Based upon our review of the brief and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632888 - 2023-03-14
State v. Randy J. Krueger
that the instant offense was the third offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
that the instant offense was the third offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Krueger
offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record and that the court erroneously submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11489 - 2017-09-19
offense by introducing a certified copy of his driving record and that the court erroneously submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11489 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
the record did not contain the official toxicology test result or form DOC-77, which addresses statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08