Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 6190 for sheriff.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 6190 for sheriff.
[PDF]
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
This court affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4778 - 2017-09-19
This court affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4778 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Rock v. James M. Goldhagen
, Rock County Sheriff’s Deputy Jason Laufenberg saw a white panel van pass a semi in a no-passing zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2485 - 2017-09-19
, Rock County Sheriff’s Deputy Jason Laufenberg saw a white panel van pass a semi in a no-passing zone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2485 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph Bogdanske
, a sheriff’s deputy who was dispatched to the accident scene observed the truck with a blown tire riding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
, a sheriff’s deputy who was dispatched to the accident scene observed the truck with a blown tire riding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2324 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason E. Fladhammer
it in place. ¶3 Fladhammer did not testify at trial. A Vernon County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4985 - 2005-03-31
it in place. ¶3 Fladhammer did not testify at trial. A Vernon County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4985 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in the fucking head, too.” ¶5 After a sheriff’s deputy arrived and transported Lewallen from the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30142 - 2007-09-04
in the fucking head, too.” ¶5 After a sheriff’s deputy arrived and transported Lewallen from the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30142 - 2007-09-04
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
the judgment and remands for a new trial. Background ¶2 On February 3, 2001, deputy sheriff William
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and remands for a new trial. Background ¶2 On February 3, 2001, deputy sheriff William
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4899 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140332 - 2015-04-22
decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140332 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2011, Jefferson county sheriff’s deputies contacted Chivers at his residence and asked him to meet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118620 - 2014-09-15
, 2011, Jefferson county sheriff’s deputies contacted Chivers at his residence and asked him to meet
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118620 - 2014-09-15
State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
of conviction. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
County Sheriff’s Department and the City of Sheboygan Police Department were involved. “Police” refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116711 - 2017-09-21
County Sheriff’s Department and the City of Sheboygan Police Department were involved. “Police” refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116711 - 2017-09-21