Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Marla Biliack v. Mark Biliack
for a period of five years. Mark contends that the trial court erroneously No. 00-3249 2 exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3334 - 2017-09-19
for a period of five years. Mark contends that the trial court erroneously No. 00-3249 2 exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3334 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
motion seeking a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
motion seeking a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nels H. Rieth
: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting certain testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting certain testimony; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Katherine E. Brooks v. Robert D. Brooks
family support payments from Brooks in her income. She claims that the trial court failed to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14037 - 2014-09-15
family support payments from Brooks in her income. She claims that the trial court failed to address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14037 - 2014-09-15
State v. Charles Young-Cooper
the judgment and the order of the trial court. ¶2 Young-Cooper’s first argument on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14646 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and the order of the trial court. ¶2 Young-Cooper’s first argument on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14646 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial on the ground of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
witnesses testified, including three who were called on R.G.’s behalf. Ultimately, the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
witnesses testified, including three who were called on R.G.’s behalf. Ultimately, the trial court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by unfairly emphasizing certain factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by unfairly emphasizing certain factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33618 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
are whether Holifield’s mental health concerns and the trial court’s erroneous impression that this forgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
are whether Holifield’s mental health concerns and the trial court’s erroneous impression that this forgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
State v. Matthew Tyler
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Tyler was not denied due process and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13121 - 2005-03-31
received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Tyler was not denied due process and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13121 - 2005-03-31