Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38311 - 38320 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 38311 - 38320 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. James L. Larson
)(a) (2001-02). 1 Larson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5822 - 2017-09-19
)(a) (2001-02). 1 Larson contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5822 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶5 Jaster and Selective filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. In her motion, Jaster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
. ¶5 Jaster and Selective filed cross-motions for partial summary judgment. In her motion, Jaster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
authority to modify his sentences. The court denied the motion and he now appeals. ¶2 Doe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904998 - 2025-01-24
authority to modify his sentences. The court denied the motion and he now appeals. ¶2 Doe argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=904998 - 2025-01-24
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 Kerner filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91732 - 2013-01-16
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. ¶3 Kerner filed a postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91732 - 2013-01-16
Kristin D. Rizzuto v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
of the potential for a defective tile.” At a hearing on the motion, the Rizzutos further claimed that Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5400 - 2005-03-31
of the potential for a defective tile.” At a hearing on the motion, the Rizzutos further claimed that Jackson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5400 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
granting a mistrial on a finding of manifest necessity and denying Davis’ motion to dismiss with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
granting a mistrial on a finding of manifest necessity and denying Davis’ motion to dismiss with prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36279 - 2009-04-28
Precision Cable Assemblies LLC v. Central Resistor Corporation
motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Central Resistor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3136 - 2005-03-31
motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Central Resistor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3136 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
but altered that to accommodate the prosecution’s witness. ¶4 At a hearing on Cardoza’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
but altered that to accommodate the prosecution’s witness. ¶4 At a hearing on Cardoza’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36460 - 2009-05-12
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
In October 2000, Ziegler filed a motion to vacate the portion of the amended judgment ordering restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
In October 2000, Ziegler filed a motion to vacate the portion of the amended judgment ordering restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
instructions misstated the law and that AnchorBank’s counsel violated the court’s ruling on a motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72170 - 2011-10-11
instructions misstated the law and that AnchorBank’s counsel violated the court’s ruling on a motion in limine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72170 - 2011-10-11