Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38321 - 38330 of 83973 for case search.
Search results 38321 - 38330 of 83973 for case search.
State v. Robert Vargas
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
barred, and further requests limitations on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
barred, and further requests limitations on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
State v. Joshua Jenkins
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
not been stopped. ¶9 The threshold issue in this case is whether, under the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15367 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
be penalized, including having default judgment entered against him in the grounds phase of the case, if he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112086 - 2014-05-06
be penalized, including having default judgment entered against him in the grounds phase of the case, if he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112086 - 2014-05-06
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7785 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the case; Lovelace’s argument on appeal relates to the second note. In that note, the jury asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
to the case; Lovelace’s argument on appeal relates to the second note. In that note, the jury asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209233 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
be addressed); State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (“cases should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
be addressed); State v. Blalock, 150 Wis. 2d 688, 703, 442 N.W.2d 514, 520 (Ct. App. 1989) (“cases should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51725 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08