Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38341 - 38350 of 40048 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] State v. Michael Lee Webster
statement in a previous case that “[t]he mere possession of an item identifiable as a sawed-off shotgun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7732 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Kywanda F.
. . . ." The State argued in its brief that this broad statement constituted a finding as a matter of historical
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16923 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lesley Thomas v. Michael J. Bickler
, the supreme court has neither qualified the legislative statements nor suggested that the statute applies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4229 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
statement into question. Furthermore, Craig does not argue that the court initiated, permitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140357 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
with a Statement of Charges. It contained eighteen separate charges which “evince[d] a pattern of behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6970 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
for the Challenge Incarceration Program is merely a statement to the Department of Corrections that the court does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33865 - 2008-09-02

[PDF] State v. Wade L. Huggins
the correct number of prior offenses. Instead, counsel relied on the defendant's statement that he had been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10550 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Al Curtis v. Jon E. Litscher
is unable to secure a statement from the requested witness, then the inmate has been prejudiced through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4146 - 2017-09-20

Anita Gartz v. J&J Association Holding, LLC
statements in closing, a tenant is not responsible for the depreciation of appliances absent extraordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6708 - 2005-03-31

John M. Maciolek v. Patrick L. Ross
and the counteroffer. However, the statement of the parol evidence rule provided by Ross applies on its face after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26544 - 2006-09-20