Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38341 - 38350 of 40043 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by this statement whether Canady intends to raise the prospect that someone else committed the shooting, while he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577798 - 2022-10-19

[PDF] Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H.
next to the statement "[n]one needed to benefit from special education" is checked, and the boxes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16507 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Lindsey A.F.
for deferred prosecution. Nowhere in this subsection is there a statement that the judge may do this only
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16462 - 2017-09-21

Jeanette Ocasio v. Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital
. ¶14 The purpose of ch. 655 is apparent from the statement of legislative intent in the statutes
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16439 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Lee Webster
statement in a previous case that “[t]he mere possession of an item identifiable as a sawed-off shotgun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7732 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
1284 … and I make that statement for purposes of the record. While Tamms’ attorney ultimately withdrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46286 - 2010-01-26

[PDF] Robert Kopfhamer v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
relied on statements it had made at an earlier hearing. The subject of that hearing was a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3993 - 2017-09-20

State v. Michael Lee Webster
] In support of the notion that a sawed-off shotgun is “of its own kind or class,” we note our statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7732 - 2005-03-31

Clark County Department of Human Services v. Antonia R.
that parental rights may be terminated in the future[,]” and our statement that the notice in § 48.356
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7605 - 2005-03-31

State v. Tony M. Smith
of the prosecutor's statement, he clearly states that the State is recommending 58 months in prison. [5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8415 - 2005-03-31