Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38361 - 38370 of 58492 for speedy trial.

Jerald M. Kenison v. Wellington Insurance Company
the trial court's denial of Wellington's motion for summary judgment. The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12634 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a counterclaim for trespass. Following a trial to the court, judgment was entered in the Paulsens’ favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43131 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Anthony S.
that because time limits in which to commence a trial in juvenile court are not present in § 938.998, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15546 - 2017-09-21

State v. Timothy L. Demmer
of Demmer’s arguments and affirm the trial court. Background ¶2 Officer Jeffrey Haas was on patrol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21511 - 2006-02-22

State v. Wade M. Harshman
the stop, and a sufficient basis for his arrest.[5] The trial court thus correctly held that Hevey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2488 - 2005-03-31

Dairy Source, Inc. v. Biery Cheese Co.
Cheese in the suit filed against it by Dairy Source, Inc. We agree with the trial court that American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5870 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Margaret Hoffman v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
” within the meaning of the statute. ¶2 The Hoffmans argue that the trial court erroneously ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4640 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
proceedings. ¶5 The circuit court scheduled a jury trial for April 28, 2015 through May 1, 2015. On April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165273 - 2017-09-21

State v. Arminius D. Jones
in possession of a firearm conviction. He also appeals an order denying his motion for a new trial. Jones
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5022 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] James C. Thomson v. United Water Services Milwaukee, LLC
review a trial court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5647 - 2017-09-19