Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38371 - 38380 of 63957 for records.

State v. Ronald J. Lubinski
. To determine if a person would reasonably believe he was under arrest, this court reviews the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15008 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph J. Hammill
3 Chapter 72 of the Supreme Court Rules dictates the minimum retention time for court records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24997 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ricky A. Myhre
criminal record was relatively serious. There was also new evidence presented at sentencing suggesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25935 - 2006-07-18

State v. Kenneth Blue
) there was an audio recording of the tip providing a record of the tip and its content, id. at ¶37; (5) the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3182 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael Marks
, we may affirm a decision if we can determine for ourselves that the facts of record provide a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6725 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
to be consecutive to the forty-year homicide sentence. The record contains only one judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15489 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
), (3)(a)2. More concerning, however, is Safeco’s misrepresentation of the record. Safeco informs us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97054 - 2013-05-20

State v. Cornelius Flowers
expressly found Flowers’ testimony to be incredible. ¶16 The record supports the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5709 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the Record to ascertain whether there are facts that support the trial court’s legal conclusions. Schneller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27555 - 2006-12-26

Converse and Lovina Smith v. Wisconsin Institute for Torah Study, Inc.
to differences of opinion within the department regarding the code's interpretation, the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11552 - 2005-03-31