Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 69399 for as he.
State v. David R. Bjerkaas
was entered after the court sentenced him to a prison term following revocation of his probation. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16092 - 2005-03-31
was entered after the court sentenced him to a prison term following revocation of his probation. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16092 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
material. He argues the State presented insufficient evidence to establish that he exhibited the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42449 - 2009-10-19
material. He argues the State presented insufficient evidence to establish that he exhibited the materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42449 - 2009-10-19
State v. David N. Blackburn
stepdaughter. He argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3223 - 2005-03-31
stepdaughter. He argues that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the conviction. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3223 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Smith
admitted that he was with the juvenile at the time of the assault, but testified that nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9811 - 2005-03-31
admitted that he was with the juvenile at the time of the assault, but testified that nothing happened
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP1711 2 (2009-10).1 He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64065 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2010AP1711 2 (2009-10).1 He also appeals an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64065 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea because he alleged he did not understand the elements of the offense. Specifically, Gravelle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100004 - 2017-09-21
plea because he alleged he did not understand the elements of the offense. Specifically, Gravelle
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Gant (9). At the hearing on Brown’s motion, Wawrzonek testified that on July 3, 2010, he
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/brown1.pdf - 2014-03-30
Gant (9). At the hearing on Brown’s motion, Wawrzonek testified that on July 3, 2010, he
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/brown1.pdf - 2014-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issues under § 974.06 because he did not raise them in the direct appeal. We conclude that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628619 - 2023-03-02
issues under § 974.06 because he did not raise them in the direct appeal. We conclude that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=628619 - 2023-03-02
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court oral argument - January 2023
in Rennick’s kidney; the location of the clip was in an area where Dr. Waples indicated he would not have put
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsjan2023.pdf - 2023-01-12
in Rennick’s kidney; the location of the clip was in an area where Dr. Waples indicated he would not have put
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsjan2023.pdf - 2023-01-12
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2023
in Rennick’s kidney; the location of the clip was in an area where Dr. Waples indicated he would not have put
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611514 - 2023-01-12
in Rennick’s kidney; the location of the clip was in an area where Dr. Waples indicated he would not have put
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611514 - 2023-01-12