Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 49958 for our.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 49958 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
the answer to this question is “yes.” We need finality in our litigation. [Wisconsin Stat. §] 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
the answer to this question is “yes.” We need finality in our litigation. [Wisconsin Stat. §] 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
and enrichment of the citizens of this state. Id. We do not agree that our interpretation of the manual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
and enrichment of the citizens of this state. Id. We do not agree that our interpretation of the manual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
State v. James W. Keith
for counsel is a legal question). On the other hand, our non-exhaustive research reveals that at least one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5000 - 2005-03-31
for counsel is a legal question). On the other hand, our non-exhaustive research reveals that at least one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5000 - 2005-03-31
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey C.
When reviewing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, our examination of counsel’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
When reviewing an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, our examination of counsel’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5007 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher S.
emphasize that in our view a prompt filing of a petition in these circumstances is the better practice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9506 - 2005-03-31
emphasize that in our view a prompt filing of a petition in these circumstances is the better practice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion when it imposed a consecutive sentence without a specific reason. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669231 - 2023-06-21
discretion when it imposed a consecutive sentence without a specific reason. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669231 - 2023-06-21
State v. Eric D. Gillespie
, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341. “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
, 253 Wis. 2d 449, 646 N.W.2d 341. “When interpreting a statute, our purpose is to discern legislative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to object to this testimony constituted deficient performance in light of our conclusion discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15
to object to this testimony constituted deficient performance in light of our conclusion discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
did not understand; and that he had a learning disability. After our order for the supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
did not understand; and that he had a learning disability. After our order for the supplemental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
State v. William P. Eckola
with it a mandatory or presumptive minimum sentence. In State v. Duffy, 54 Wis. 2d 61, 65, 194 N.W.2d 624 (1972), our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3857 - 2005-03-31
with it a mandatory or presumptive minimum sentence. In State v. Duffy, 54 Wis. 2d 61, 65, 194 N.W.2d 624 (1972), our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3857 - 2005-03-31