Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 46103 for paternity test paper work.
State v. Linda Lacey
“The determination of whether there has been a denial of a speedy trial involves a four-factor balancing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
“The determination of whether there has been a denial of a speedy trial involves a four-factor balancing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6991 - 2005-03-31
Constance Wolfgram v. Lewis E. Olson
in relevant part: Motions challenging sufficiency of evidence; motions after verdict. (1) Test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11247 - 2005-03-31
in relevant part: Motions challenging sufficiency of evidence; motions after verdict. (1) Test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11247 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
proper to allow an exhibit into the jury room during deliberations so that the jury can test the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146392 - 2015-08-17
proper to allow an exhibit into the jury room during deliberations so that the jury can test the validity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146392 - 2015-08-17
State v. Rex B. Roberts
. In the fourth amendment context, the test for abandonment of property is distinct from the property law notion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
. In the fourth amendment context, the test for abandonment of property is distinct from the property law notion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8149 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Id. at 249-50. Singler’s arguments do not meet this test. In any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85394 - 2012-07-25
State v. John Doe
-part test to determine whether the defendant is deserving of a sentencing reduction in light of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
-part test to determine whether the defendant is deserving of a sentencing reduction in light of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7396 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
deferential” test 2 The State did not argue that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
deferential” test 2 The State did not argue that any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245334 - 2019-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
… [the] judgment to that actually pronounced.” Id. at 37. The test is whether nunc pro tunc entry “will make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
… [the] judgment to that actually pronounced.” Id. at 37. The test is whether nunc pro tunc entry “will make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92106 - 2013-01-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the State, but stated that he did not think that was the test. Defense counsel stated that, in his view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15
to the State, but stated that he did not think that was the test. Defense counsel stated that, in his view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74579 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. When conducting that review, we liberally apply the ‘“new issues”’ test. See id., ¶12 (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21
. When conducting that review, we liberally apply the ‘“new issues”’ test. See id., ¶12 (citation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184810 - 2017-09-21