Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38391 - 38400 of 83455 for simple case search.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26957 - 2006-10-30

[PDF] Stephen E. Lee v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8807 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Norwest Bank Wisconsin Eau Claire, N.A. v. Michael G. Plourde
to the breach of contract issue, the judgment is affirmed. This case has a long, complex history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11334 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was not entitled to credit in this case for the time he was serving his Illinois sentence. The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255513 - 2020-02-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so, whether there are any material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Helena Fedders v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
expended a great deal of time and effort in presenting this case, we briefly explain our holding. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15629 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Carolyn Rae Jarman v. Larry Howard Welter
2006 WI APP 54 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2005AP1616
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21398 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Westridge Builders, Inc. v. Linda A. Fridlington
be supplied.” Perkins v. Gosewehr, 98 Wis. 2d 158, 163, 295 N.W.2d 789 (Ct. App. 1980). ¶7 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2631 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
incorrectly—that the Menzer case was a read-in. ¶3 Uitz filed a postconviction motion for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88170 - 2012-10-15

Certification
violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents the question
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84445 - 2012-07-04