Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 26450 for marital settlement agreement/1000.

Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
of the judgment of divorce that divided the marital property and denied her request to award attorney’s fees. She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18407 - 2005-06-07

COURT OF APPEALS
of the marital estate during the pendency of the divorce. We affirm the circuit court. ¶2 Divorcing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08

[PDF] Diane L. Guse v. Ronald C. Guse
by awarding maintenance and by granting Diane substantially more than one-half of the marital property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9216 - 2017-09-19

Diane L. Guse v. Ronald C. Guse
by awarding maintenance and by granting Diane substantially more than one-half of the marital property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9216 - 2005-03-31

Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
to be included in the marital estate for division at divorce. The termination package constitutes Jerry’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3934 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dana J. Stadler v. Linda M. Stadler
that marital property law, WIS. STAT. § 766.31, provides ground for reversal. We disagree. The Marital
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6354 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Debra Louise Groff v. Jeffrey Alan Groff
that portion of the judgment of divorce that divided the marital property and denied her request to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18407 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
litigated issues of maintenance, property division and attorney fees. The net marital estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36882 - 2009-06-24

COURT OF APPEALS
the marital property and ordered her former husband, Thomas Handland, to pay her an equalization payment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54971 - 2010-09-29

Dana J. Stadler v. Linda M. Stadler
. ¶11 Dana argues that marital property law, Wis. Stat. § 766.31, provides ground for reversal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6354 - 2005-03-31