Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 12458 for mr.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that Lopez had repeatedly withheld the child from Lohrentz in bad faith. As the court stated: I think Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73910 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
using a fictitious name. Finally, the letter stated: No. 2007AP1094 3 I believe Mrs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30731 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
was undeveloped and merely argued “the affidavit in support of [the] search warrant for Mr. Neubauer’s residence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257971 - 2020-04-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
prejudiced Mr. Leblanc[’]s defense and that, but for those errors, there exist[s] a reasonable probability
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07

State v. Lamont Williams
a hold over you for as long as it can, Mr. Williams, and everybody in this courtroom knows or should know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7146 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
complains: No. 2011AP981-CR 5 Here, the officer told Mr. Dehne, “If you wanna talk to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89958 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
whatever fine was imposed. ¶4 The trial court ruled: All right. At this time Mr. Cooper is here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26706 - 2006-10-09

CA Blank Order
remarks: Mr. Gilliom was lying to you. And not everyone who takes the oath and swears to tell the truth
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98007 - 2013-06-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a time where you tried to put a case on Mr. Borges?” The trial court immediately held a discussion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=808449 - 2024-06-04

COURT OF APPEALS
complaint and determined “it contain[ed] a sufficient factual basis for Mr. Holan’s pleas.” The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77416 - 2012-01-30