Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 6141 for sheriff.
[PDF]
James P. Watkins v. William G. Eastman
by a sheriff's deputy who investigated at Watkins's request. According to the deputy, Eastman said that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
by a sheriff's deputy who investigated at Watkins's request. According to the deputy, Eastman said that when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7979 - 2017-09-19
State v. Leroy W. Senn
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene of the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene of the fire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3472 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the victim made to a sheriff’s deputy. This court affirmed the conviction. Degorski then filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
the victim made to a sheriff’s deputy. This court affirmed the conviction. Degorski then filed a pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076014 - 2026-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
a mistrial because the Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Department failed to preserve exculpatory evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
a mistrial because the Ozaukee County Sheriff’s Department failed to preserve exculpatory evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47193 - 2010-02-23
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial. ¶3 A deputy from the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27611 - 2014-09-15
trial. ¶3 A deputy from the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27611 - 2014-09-15
WI App 48 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP933 Complete Title of ...
the lie detector test had to be taken at Sand Ridge and not the local sheriff’s department. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79440 - 2012-04-24
the lie detector test had to be taken at Sand Ridge and not the local sheriff’s department. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79440 - 2012-04-24
[PDF]
State v. Faye W. Lloyd
Lac County Sheriff's Department Detective Charles Sosinski. Prior to this, Lloyd had reported two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
Lac County Sheriff's Department Detective Charles Sosinski. Prior to this, Lloyd had reported two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9595 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the floor, between her and the door. ¶4 A sheriff’s deputy testified that he received a call reporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86696 - 2014-09-15
on the floor, between her and the door. ¶4 A sheriff’s deputy testified that he received a call reporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86696 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Patrick Wolf
court. 5 On July 29, 2001, at 12:07 a.m., Deputy Winger of the Walworth County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
court. 5 On July 29, 2001, at 12:07 a.m., Deputy Winger of the Walworth County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5311 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to testify that the gun was unloaded, with no bullets in the “clip.” A sheriff’s deputy testified, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04
to testify that the gun was unloaded, with no bullets in the “clip.” A sheriff’s deputy testified, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04