Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 6141 for sheriff.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 6141 for sheriff.
COURT OF APPEALS
with a Sheboygan County Sheriff’s Department drug unit investigator. The informant was told that if he assisted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56376 - 2010-11-09
with a Sheboygan County Sheriff’s Department drug unit investigator. The informant was told that if he assisted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56376 - 2010-11-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial. ¶3 A deputy from the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27611 - 2014-09-15
trial. ¶3 A deputy from the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27611 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
complaint of Richland County Sheriff's Deputy Daniel H. Krueger. Deputy Krueger relies on the unsworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
complaint of Richland County Sheriff's Deputy Daniel H. Krueger. Deputy Krueger relies on the unsworn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12919 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
At about 9:25 p.m., Deputy Sheriff Samuel Miller encountered a man who matched the residents’ description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
At about 9:25 p.m., Deputy Sheriff Samuel Miller encountered a man who matched the residents’ description
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078110 - 2026-02-17
COURT OF APPEALS
decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140332 - 2015-04-22
decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140332 - 2015-04-22
[PDF]
State v. John G. Yager
, Deputy Daniel Carey took Yager to the Iowa County Sheriff’s Department. After arriving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
, Deputy Daniel Carey took Yager to the Iowa County Sheriff’s Department. After arriving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Todd A. Wild
Deputy Sheriff Edward R. Breitsprecker Jr. testified that on January 6, 1996, at about 8:56 p.m., he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
Deputy Sheriff Edward R. Breitsprecker Jr. testified that on January 6, 1996, at about 8:56 p.m., he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12603 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Chad A. Demerath
suppressed and reverses the order. FACTS ¶2 On November 6, 2004, Forest County sheriff’s deputy Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21124 - 2017-09-21
suppressed and reverses the order. FACTS ¶2 On November 6, 2004, Forest County sheriff’s deputy Jeffrey
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21124 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Aaron C. Tuomi
. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff Matthew Ronk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5472 - 2017-09-19
. Background ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On June 23, 2001, Brown County deputy sheriff Matthew Ronk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5472 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Leroy W. Senn
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20
in a snow bank. At 2:32 p.m., Marinette County Sheriff’s deputy Brian Witt arrived at the scene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3472 - 2017-09-20