Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 7645 for yes.
Search results 3841 - 3850 of 7645 for yes.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the plea that was given to [him]”; that trial counsel told him “just say yes to everything”; that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
the plea that was given to [him]”; that trial counsel told him “just say yes to everything”; that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913151 - 2025-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 21, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
to the crime of first degree intentional homicide? [Wilson]: No. THE COURT: Yes or no? [Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27527 - 2006-12-20
to the crime of first degree intentional homicide? [Wilson]: No. THE COURT: Yes or no? [Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27527 - 2006-12-20
Brown County v. Jeffrey T.M.
Jeffrey would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn. Soncrant answered yes; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5596 - 2005-03-31
Jeffrey would be a proper subject for commitment if treatment were withdrawn. Soncrant answered yes; he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5596 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the answer to this question is “yes.” We need finality in our litigation. [Wisconsin Stat. §] 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
the answer to this question is “yes.” We need finality in our litigation. [Wisconsin Stat. §] 974.06(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58004 - 2010-12-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Sergeant Gonzalez answered, “Yes, most definitely.” Sergeant Gonzalez explained his reasoning as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
. Sergeant Gonzalez answered, “Yes, most definitely.” Sergeant Gonzalez explained his reasoning as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78849 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
answered, “Yes.” Later, when attempting to satisfy itself there was a factual basis for Basley’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263389 - 2020-06-09
answered, “Yes.” Later, when attempting to satisfy itself there was a factual basis for Basley’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263389 - 2020-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
somebody out to the house realizing, yes, this is a dangerous condition.” This prompted the court to ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
somebody out to the house realizing, yes, this is a dangerous condition.” This prompted the court to ask
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335498 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
State v. Roy McGee
the form with him. McGee answered “yes” to each question. Further, the trial court twice summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10207 - 2017-09-20
the form with him. McGee answered “yes” to each question. Further, the trial court twice summarized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10207 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
at the building, he asked Stewart if he could search the apartment and that Stewart said yes. He testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
at the building, he asked Stewart if he could search the apartment and that Stewart said yes. He testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8917 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of certainty whether or not a vehicle’s tint was compliant, he responded unequivocally, “Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15
of certainty whether or not a vehicle’s tint was compliant, he responded unequivocally, “Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15