Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38401 - 38410 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38401 - 38410 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Lorne Demars
of the repeater allegation because it did not reference the specific convictions providing a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
of the repeater allegation because it did not reference the specific convictions providing a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4011 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
,” but did not allow the introduction of the videotape into evidence. In addition, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110588 - 2014-04-23
,” but did not allow the introduction of the videotape into evidence. In addition, the court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110588 - 2014-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
, deficient for failing to seek a substitution of judge. In the context of explaining why he did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
, deficient for failing to seek a substitution of judge. In the context of explaining why he did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
State v. Steven T. Fink
without an attorney. Fink indicated that he did. ¶5 The circuit court conducted a plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4909 - 2005-03-31
without an attorney. Fink indicated that he did. ¶5 The circuit court conducted a plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
or intimidating, and he did not realize that the voice mail message would violate the TRO. At trial, Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77700 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Vicki L. Thomas v. Frederick W. Thomas
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No. 97-1780-FT 3 did not include a financial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No. 97-1780-FT 3 did not include a financial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12645 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
had previously represented Lee as defense counsel in 2004. The judge did not recall serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32709 - 2008-05-20
had previously represented Lee as defense counsel in 2004. The judge did not recall serving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32709 - 2008-05-20
CA Blank Order
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
—at Sturdevant’s request—to March 2012. Sturdevant did not appear in court on the March return date, however
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111436 - 2014-04-29
State v. Dexter Tolefree
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to apply the “least punishment” principle and to explain why it did not order a lesser sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15
to apply the “least punishment” principle and to explain why it did not order a lesser sentence than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55260 - 2014-09-15