Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38401 - 38410 of 57152 for id.
Search results 38401 - 38410 of 57152 for id.
State v. Terry Patterson
about its meaning. Id. When a statute is clear on its face, however, we will not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14701 - 2005-03-31
about its meaning. Id. When a statute is clear on its face, however, we will not look beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14701 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Norman Earl Rhodes
the defendant made the requisite prima facie showing. Id. at 831, 416 N.W.2d at 631. During the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
the defendant made the requisite prima facie showing. Id. at 831, 416 N.W.2d at 631. During the brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ricardo Glover
the complaint “does not charge an offense known to law.” Id. (citations omitted). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
the complaint “does not charge an offense known to law.” Id. (citations omitted). In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2643 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denied the motion after a hearing. We affirmed because trial counsel did not perform deficiently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258636 - 2020-05-08
denied the motion after a hearing. We affirmed because trial counsel did not perform deficiently. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258636 - 2020-05-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Id. at 694
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206894 - 2018-01-11
Raymond M. Gregor v. Robert Paugels, Jr.
accrued immediately prior to the commencement of Gregor’s adverse possession action. See id. at 699, 580
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14788 - 2005-03-31
accrued immediately prior to the commencement of Gregor’s adverse possession action. See id. at 699, 580
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14788 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
factor. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to independent review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
factor. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to independent review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31684 - 2008-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not.” Id., 284 U.S. at 304. This test was essentially codified at WIS. STAT. § 939.71 (2017-18).5 ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243320 - 2019-07-09
not.” Id., 284 U.S. at 304. This test was essentially codified at WIS. STAT. § 939.71 (2017-18).5 ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243320 - 2019-07-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidence.” Id. (quoted source omitted). Reed testified that no other trash was present when the bags
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157463 - 2017-09-21
evidence.” Id. (quoted source omitted). Reed testified that no other trash was present when the bags
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157463 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for that committed to the board by the legislature.” Id. ¶8 On review, therefore, our function is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252636 - 2020-01-22
for that committed to the board by the legislature.” Id. ¶8 On review, therefore, our function is limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252636 - 2020-01-22