Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 68502 for did.
State v. George T. Wolfer, Jr.
as it did, and we therefore affirm the judgment. The underlying facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
as it did, and we therefore affirm the judgment. The underlying facts are undisputed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9344 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Keith A. Brouwer
but stated that he did not believe that he was intoxicated. While Brouwer spoke, the deputy detected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19952 - 2017-09-21
but stated that he did not believe that he was intoxicated. While Brouwer spoke, the deputy detected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19952 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel D. Brown
in the outcome of the case. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
in the outcome of the case. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25550 - 2017-09-21
Wildeck, Inc. v. Thomas J. Cousar
never been to Wisconsin for any reason. Cousar did not seek out Wildeck as the subcontractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3457 - 2005-03-31
never been to Wisconsin for any reason. Cousar did not seek out Wildeck as the subcontractor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3457 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The no-merit report also did not discuss sentencing. Based on the incomplete no-merit report filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
. The no-merit report also did not discuss sentencing. Based on the incomplete no-merit report filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913090 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for suspicion for operating while intoxicated, and that alone was the reason for the arrest, officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134925 - 2017-09-21
for suspicion for operating while intoxicated, and that alone was the reason for the arrest, officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134925 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Smith asserts he did not enter a knowing and intelligent plea because (1) the court failed to adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
. Smith asserts he did not enter a knowing and intelligent plea because (1) the court failed to adequately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46458 - 2010-02-01
State v. Charles B. Dietzen
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
aggregating five misdemeanors into three felonies. He argues that the prosecutor did not have the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8932 - 2005-03-31
Norman Meka v. City of Milwaukee Annuity and Pension Board and Robert G. Nehls
was not totally and permanently disabled because of a work injury and that the evidence did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8939 - 2005-03-31
was not totally and permanently disabled because of a work injury and that the evidence did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8939 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel D. Brown
. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his investigation produced any evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14
. The judge’s husband did not testify, nor does the record show that his investigation produced any evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25550 - 2006-06-14